Amazon EKS Auto Mode vs Azure AKS Automatic: The Better Managed Kubernetes Solution?

Reading Time: 4 minutes

Alright, I’ll admit it, I’m a bit biased towards Azure AKS. It’s hard not to be, given the depth of automation and integration it offers. But that doesn’t mean I can’t appreciate a solid effort from AWS, and EKS Auto Mode is definitely a step in the right direction. It’s great to see AWS making Kubernetes management easier, even if they’re still playing catch-up. Here’s a detailed comparison to highlight the differences and why AKS Automatic continues to set the standard for managed Kubernetes.

Automation Scope

• EKS Auto Mode:
  • Automates node provisioning and scaling using Karpenter, a powerful dynamic scaling solution.
  • Leaves manual setup for key configurations, including:
    • Networking (VPCs and subnets).
    • RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) policies.
    • Pod-level autoscaling and resource allocation.
  • Relies on AWS CloudWatch and X-Ray for observability, which require additional manual setup.
• AKS Automatic:
  • Provides end-to-end automation, covering:
    • Node and workload scaling.
    • Networking configurations through automated Virtual Network (VNet) setup.
    • Security and governance tools like Entra ID (Azure Active Directory) integration.
  • Integrates seamlessly with Azure Monitor, delivering Kubernetes-specific observability out of the box.

Key Takeaway: AKS Automatic automates far more than EKS Auto Mode, significantly reducing the need for manual intervention.

Monitoring and Observability

• EKS Auto Mode:
  • Uses CloudWatch and X-Ray for monitoring, but these require manual configuration to provide actionable Kubernetes insights.
  • Limited built-in support for Kubernetes-specific metrics like pod performance or cluster health.
• AKS Automatic:
  • Comes with Azure Monitor fully integrated.
  • Offers pre-configured dashboards, real-time metrics, and alerting for cluster and application performance.
  • Simplifies debugging with built-in observability tools, requiring minimal setup.

Key Takeaway: Azure Monitor gives AKS Automatic a strong advantage by delivering detailed, ready-to-use observability features, eliminating the need for extra setup.

Scaling

Both services use Karpenter for intelligent node scaling, but their approaches to workload scaling differ:

• EKS Auto Mode:
  • Automates node-level scaling but leaves pod autoscaling configurations to the user.
  • Focuses on infrastructure rather than workload management.
• AKS Automatic:
  • Combines Karpenter’s node scaling with Azure’s workload autoscaling, which handles pod scaling automatically.
  • Allows customizable scaling policies for both nodes and workloads, ensuring resources match application demands.

Key Takeaway: AKS Automatic’s integration of workload and node scaling creates a seamless scaling experience compared to the node-focused EKS Auto Mode.

Security and Governance

• EKS Auto Mode:
  • Implements strong defaults like SELinux enforcement, read-only root file systems, and frequent node recycling.
  • Lacks integrated tools for advanced governance or compliance monitoring.
• AKS Automatic:
  • Features Azure Security Center, offering advanced threat detection and compliance management.
  • Integrates with Entra ID (Azure Active Directory) for centralized identity and access management.
  • Provides customizable RBAC with minimal configuration effort.

Key Takeaway: AKS Automatic delivers enterprise-grade security and governance tools, making it a better fit for production environments with stringent compliance needs.

Networking

• EKS Auto Mode:
  • Requires manual configuration of VPCs, subnets, and network policies.
  • Complexity increases with private or hybrid networking setups.
• AKS Automatic:
  • Automates VNet configuration, enabling seamless deployment of clusters without deep networking expertise.
  • Supports advanced networking setups while simplifying the process for users.

Key Takeaway: Networking is more accessible and less error-prone with AKS Automatic, thanks to its automated VNet integration.

Updates and Lifecycle Management

Keeping Kubernetes clusters and nodes up to date is essential for maintaining security, stability, and performance. Both Amazon EKS Auto Mode and Azure AKS Automatic automate updates, but their strategies differ significantly.

• EKS Auto Mode:
  • Implements automatic node recycling every 21 days, ensuring nodes are regularly refreshed with the latest security patches and updates.
  • Automates node version updates, but control plane upgrades require user initiation and validation of application compatibility.
  • While updates are automated, some manual oversight may be necessary for clusters with custom configurations or integrations.
• AKS Automatic:
  • Provides automated updates for both the control plane and node pools, ensuring the entire cluster stays current.
  • Uses rolling upgrades to minimize downtime, maintaining cluster availability during updates.
  • Offers a configurable maintenance window, allowing you to define specific time frames for updates to occur, reducing the risk of disruptions to critical workloads.
  • Integrates with Azure Advisor to recommend Kubernetes version upgrades and ensure workloads remain compatible with the latest features.

Key Takeaway: EKS Auto Mode’s frequent node recycling ensures security patches are applied regularly, but AKS Automatic offers a more comprehensive update process. With automated updates for the entire cluster, rolling upgrades, and customizable maintenance windows, AKS Automatic provides a smoother, more predictable lifecycle management experience.

Operational Burden

• EKS Auto Mode:
  • Reduces operational tasks for node management but still requires manual setup for key components like monitoring, scaling policies, and security.
  • Feels more like an incremental improvement to AKS with Node Auto-Provisioning than a fully managed service.
• AKS Automatic:
  • Significantly lowers operational overhead by automating the entire Kubernetes lifecycle.
  • Designed for teams seeking a hands-off Kubernetes experience.

Key Takeaway: For a truly managed solution, AKS Automatic is the clear winner, offering minimal operational burden.

Feature Comparison Table

Feature	EKS Auto Mode	AKS Automatic
Automation Scope	Node management and scaling	Full lifecycle automation
Monitoring	CloudWatch/X-Ray (manual setup)	Built-in Azure Monitor
Scaling	Node-level scaling with Karpenter	Node and workload scaling, fully automated
Security	Defaults like SELinux, read-only root files	Azure Security Center, Active Directory
Networking	Manual VPC setup	Automated VNet configuration
Updates	Node recycling every 21 days, partial automation for control plane	Fully automated updates for control plane and node pools, with rolling upgrades and maintenance windows
Operational Burden	Moderate, requires manual setup	Low, minimal user intervention

Why AKS Automatic Stands Out

• Deeper Automation: AKS Automatic automates far more than just node provisioning, covering networking, scaling, and monitoring with ease.
• Effortless Monitoring: Azure Monitor provides comprehensive Kubernetes insights without requiring additional setup.
• Enterprise-Ready Security: Tools like Azure Security Center and Active Directory make AKS Automatic a better choice for secure and compliant workloads.
• Less Effort, More Results: AKS Automatic dramatically reduces operational overhead, making it suitable for teams that want to focus on applications, not infrastructure.

Conclusion

EKS Auto Mode simplifies Kubernetes management but still leaves users with significant manual configurations, particularly in networking, monitoring, and workload scaling. AKS Automatic redefines what it means to be fully managed, offering automation across all critical areas of Kubernetes management. While EKS Auto Mode is a welcome improvement from AWS, Azure AKS Automatic remains the clear choice for a seamless, enterprise-ready Kubernetes solution.